It was super interesting to learn about
connectivism. This theory has me thinking about how we as teachers can make
learning stick with our students. It has been refreshing that our classes have
stressed that education is going away from short term education that emphasizes
regurgitation. Instead, we are trying to find ways that students can learn
applicable content to many other areas and helping students connect that
information with other classes and other areas of their lives. I would have
loved more of this type of teaching while I was in school. I wish I would have
been able to make more bridges in my brain between different content areas that
would have helped me learn.
As I reflect on my college career, I think that
there is still a need for memorization. The idea of memorization based
education has been bashed on and I would like to defend it. Being able to store
away information in my head was important for things like memorizing diagrams
of veins, muscles, and bones in our body. It is not good enough for a PE
teacher to have to look up diagrams of the body when a student has arm pain and
wants to know if they can do a certain action. It should be imbedded
information for a teacher to understand what muscles are in the body and what
they do. The same principle is true for English. Students should still memorize
what certain words mean so that they can pull out that definition when someone
uses the word in a sentence.
As you can see, memorization should still be
utilized in a classroom. It must be coupled with applications of what they are
memorizing so that the definition sticks with the student. I believe this will
improve motivation for students to learn the important information that we are
teaching them.
I think that it is important to encourage dynamic learning. Memorization is handy for certain tasks, but now a days when people are able to google facts instantly I wonder if there is better ways that they can utilize their mental efforts
ReplyDelete