As an ELA teacher, argumentation and persuasion are a critical component of what we do in the classroom. It hurts me to see that the tenets of good persuasive writing are not being utilized where they are most needed; on social media platforms.
One idea I have for integrating the use of technology in the classroom is to use comment threads as a vehicle for persuasive writing. Whether we like it or not, social media has redefined the way we argue. As an ELA teacher, I have a responsibility to teach my students to make argumentative claims that are supported by evidence and validly reasoned, and a (structured) comment thread seems like the perfect place to do this.
This use of technology in the classroom reaches the Redefinition level of the SAMR model because using technology in this way will redefine the way we teach argumentation in the classroom. There will still be room for lengthier argumentative pieces (the initial article under which the comment thread will take place), but for the most part, argumentative comments will need to be succinct and well worded. Gone are the days of the lengthy argumentative essay where there is little to no opportunity for discourse. This is an opportunity for technology to redefine how argumentative writing is taught.
In turn, the hope is that teaching these kinds of lessons will redefine the way our students actually argue online. Indeed the hope of any educational practice is that it will transfer to real-world application, but here we as ELA teachers have a chance to make a difference in a world that doesn't know how to disagree constructively. People in comment threads today are at each other's throats. Is this our chance to end the comment carnage?
I really like that lesson plan. I know that I personally avoid posting things on facebook in order to avoid getting in arguments with people. I’d much rather argue face to face. I think it would be so interesting to integrate arguments on facebook as an analog for persuasive and argumentative writing.
ReplyDelete