I admit I have been suckered into the Wikipedia donation more than once. After today’s class, I feel so much better about the stewardship of my spending. I never paused to try to understand the mission of Wikipedia, I just donated out of guilt that if I was using their product, I should pay for it in some way. Today however, I wanted to know more about this ‘free’ source, so I did a little research and found Wikipedia’s purpose defined, guess where.. Yes that’s right, on a Wikipedia page! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Purpose
Using the SAMR model, I would put this new technology into
the Redefinition category. As we
introduce Wikipedia into the classroom as a reliable source of information, it
could be viewed as just a substitution for encyclopedias, journals, textbooks
or even the more modern google search. Once
our students learn how to become editors of the knowledge and begin to
collaborate with other editors from around the globe to develop one comprehensive,
factual body of knowledge, then their learning has been redefined. They are now able to draw upon knowledge
from people all around the world and conversely have their work and ideas
viewed, reflected, and improved upon by people all around the world. To bring this type of learning into the
classroom makes my meager donation feel like money well spent.
Kim,
ReplyDeleteThank you for taking the time to both look up how Wikipedia defines its purpose and for applying the SAMR model to the framework of Wikipedia.
I completely agree with you that Wikipedia could be viewed as a substitution. I would continue to argue that for a majority of people using Wikipedia that it will remain in the substitution section because people don't really know all the benefits that Wikipedia brings to learning.
As educators we can continue to use Wikipedia in a augmented or modified approach by asking students to explain their reasoning for trusting or citing a Wikipedia source. Teaching students to use and apply the Wikipedia rubric can really modify the way they do internet research.
James